<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blueroo Interactive &#187; Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/category/blog/search-engine-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blueroo-interactive.com</link>
	<description>dont let your website get lost in cyberspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 04:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Power of Google Instant: How Does it Effect SEO?</title>
		<link>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/google-instant/</link>
		<comments>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/google-instant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BlueRoo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Instant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueroo-interactive.com/?p=1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Instant was launched on September 8, 2010 with a concept that search should be taken one step further so users get instantaneous results. With Google Instant, users can search as they type. If you are searching on the word chocolate, Google starts giving you options in the suggestions drop down the moment you hit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Instant was launched on September 8, 2010 with a concept that search should be taken one step further so users get instantaneous results. With Google Instant, users can search as they type. If you are searching on the word chocolate, Google starts giving you options in the suggestions drop down the moment you hit the letter ‘c’. However, the launch of Google Instant has got <a title="SEO Experts - Our Services" href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/services/">search engine optimization experts </a>wondering about the future of SEO and how this will affect search engine rankings.<img title="More..." src="../wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="Google Instant SEO" /><span id="more-1218"></span><br />
In an interview with TechCrunch, Marissa Meyer, VP Search Products and User Experience at Google, reported that Google Instant will have a minimal effect on search engine optimization but it could change user behavior, which in turn could impact the current SEO strategies being used by various businesses. Now, Google Instant has not changed the way pages are indexed or crawled so the chances of any change to existing page rankings is minimal.<img class="alignleft" title="Google Instant Example" src="http://www.web-site-design.tv/search_marketing_blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/google_instant1.jpg" alt="Google Instant SEO" width="424" height="317" /><br />
Let’s consider how Google Instant will change the way users search. Say you are looking for a chocolate ice cream recipe and have typed out the word chocolate when you see search results displaying links to chocolate chip cookie recipes. Looking at these links made you realise that you want to try a new recipe for chocolate chip cookies as well and you click on one of these links. According to search engine optimisation experts, this could be detrimental to a business because Google Instant has taken the user away from their original search.<br />
<a title="Matt Cutts Blog" href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">Matt Cutts </a>has said time and again that Google Instant will not affect SEO but it will definitely affect the way people search. Over a period of time, minor changes may be required however, incorporating all possible keyword variations for SEO would be impossible. Meyer and Cutts both work for Google so their take on the subject is obviously tied in with the company’s larger interest but it is impossible to deny the take of SEO experts on the subject.<br />
<a title="SEO Moz Blog" href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog">SEOMoz </a>reported on September 21, 2010 that the keyword demand has not changed with the launch of Instant. They do recommend looking at the traffic volume and comparing it to pre launch. Most popular websites have experienced positive traffic growth which they can hardly complain about!<br />
Quite a few people have been concerned about Steve Rubel’s comment about how Google Instant will make <a title="SEO Services" href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/services/internet-marketing/search-engine-optimization/">SEO </a>completely irrelevant. This is not true and Rubel has received a lot of advice from SEO gurus about how search really works.<br />
Eric Enge of Search Engine Watch suggested that advertisers can hope to get better pay per click conversion rates if Google Instant impacts the long tail. Someone new to search engines may want to type a long query, such as ‘which Canon camera is priced between $250 and $500’ and could receive results by typing Canon. Such a user will have the same readiness to buy as someone who was initially searching on a long tail keyword.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Instant SERPS Example" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:xhkdHBp_p09nNM:http://feggheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/google-instant-example2-550x523.png&amp;t=1" alt="" width="230" height="219" /><br />
AdWords users may see an increase in the number of impressions though as reported by Google. When a user types a query and pauses for three seconds, it counts as an impression. Now, when the query is completed and the results get refreshed, it will count as another impression if your ad gets displayed. This could mean a reduction in the clickthrough rates.<br />
The job of SEO experts was made difficult since the time search started getting more and more personalized. Two people could be searching on the same term, yet see different results based on their geographical locations, especially if they are signed into their Google Account.</p>
<p>In such a case, there is only a certain amount of search engine optimization that you can depend on because the results are not within your control. However, to say that the search engine optimization is becoming less relevant would be incorrect. The days of keyword stuffing and AdSense ads are definitely over – SEO techniques are getting more sophisticated and businesses actually want to provide their users with information that will make them keep coming back.</p>
         ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/google-instant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MapReduce: Now Google Invents New Ways to Manage Data!</title>
		<link>http://blueroo-interactive.com/uncategorized/google-data-basenow-google-invents-new-ways-to-manage-data/</link>
		<comments>http://blueroo-interactive.com/uncategorized/google-data-basenow-google-invents-new-ways-to-manage-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BlueRoo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blended search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google base data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MapReduce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueroo-interactive.com/?p=1135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once opon a time, if you wished to make order of large sets of data, you would need to do two things: Firstly, create a meticulously manganed and maintained database, using tags and catagories as data land-marks. Secondly you would need a very large computer, to sift through your data using complex query.

This is all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once opon a time, if you wished to make order of large sets of data, you would need to do two things: Firstly, create a meticulously manganed and maintained database, using tags and catagories as data land-marks. Secondly you would need a very large computer, to sift through your data using complex query.</p>
<p><span id="more-1135"></span></p>
<p>This is all fine, untill your data grows in size to petabyte scale, then old way simply isn&#8217;t feasible. Tagging, sorting, and categorizing, would take an emmence amount of time. A single computer, no matter how large, just can&#8217;t crunch that many numbers at once.</p>
<div id="attachment_1134" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 577px"><a href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pb_sorting_f.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1134" title="Google Data Structure" src="http://blueroo-interactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pb_sorting_f.jpg" alt="Google Data Structure" width="567" height="296" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Data Structure</p></div>
<p>Google use a very different approach, when sifting and ordering the world wide web. Thier solution for working with colossal data sets, is an approach called <strong>MapReduce</strong>.</p>
<p>It works like this:</p>
<h3>1. Collect</h3>
<p>MapReduce does not depend on traditional databases, where information is collected then categorized. We&#8217;ll just gather up the full text of every book Google has scanned.</p>
<h3>2. Map</h3>
<p>You then write a function to map the data: &#8220;Count every use of every word in Google Books.&#8221; The request then splits among all the computers within your army, each is assigned a chunk of data to work with.</p>
<h3>3. Save</h3>
<p>Each PC doing a map, writes the results to its local hard drive, cutting down on data transfer time. Then the computers that have been assigned a &#8220;reduce&#8221; function grab the lists from the mappers.</p>
<h4>4. Reduce</h4>
<p>Then the Reduce computers correlate the lists of words. Now you would know the frequency of a particular word that is used, and in which books.</p>
<h5>5. Solve</h5>
<p>The system finally creates a data set about your data! In my example, the final list of words is stored as separate sets, so it can be quickly referenced or queried. So then you don&#8217;t have to plow through unrelated data to get your answer.</p>
<p>Please drop us a comment, and share our lovely and insightfull post&#8230;thanks! <img src='http://blueroo-interactive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
         ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blueroo-interactive.com/uncategorized/google-data-basenow-google-invents-new-ways-to-manage-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tips: 9 Statistics That Prove Search Engine Optimization&#8217;s Value</title>
		<link>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/seo-tips-9-statistics-that-prove-seo-value/</link>
		<comments>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/seo-tips-9-statistics-that-prove-seo-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BlueRoo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueroo-interactive.com/?p=1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often when meeting clients, we are asked to prove the value to Search Engine Optimization,  as well is describing the many elements and methods involved with ranking a site high in the SERPS.  SEO is often hard to quantify the success of, before the event, meaning proving its value before a site has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often when meeting clients, we are asked to prove the value to Search Engine Optimization,  as well is describing the many elements and methods involved with ranking a site high in the SERPS.  SEO is often hard to quantify the success of, before the event, meaning proving its value before a site has been ranked is a constant challenge.<br />
<span> </span><br />
So we did some digging, and compiled a list of 9 web statistics proving the value of SEO, to take to with us meetings. Feeling generous we have decided to share these stats we you guys… oh how nice huh?<span id="more-1052"></span><br />
<span> </span><br />
So the stats are as a results of a number of web studies as well as testing we have done on various projects. Feel free to undertake your own research; we would be interested in hearing your thoughts.</p>
<div id="attachment_1062" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 357px"><a href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/SEO-statistics.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1062" title="SEO-statistics" src="http://blueroo-interactive.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/SEO-statistics.jpg" alt="Its All in the Stats" width="347" height="279" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Its All in the Stats</p></div>
<p><strong>1. </strong>40% of <a title="What is internet marketing " href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/services/internet-marketing/">SEO campaigns</a> aware of their ROI achieve returns in excess of 500%, while only 22% of PPC campaigns were able to achieve this value.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>2. </strong>When two top-ranking links are artificially switched, the click-through ratio of 42-8% drops to 34-12%, demonstrating the importance of engaging copy in addition to rank position.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>3.</strong> 23% of searches progress to the second page. Presumably the difference between 62% and 23% stems from searchers trying either another keyword or another engine, or giving up.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>4.</strong> 41% of searches unsuccessful after the first page choose to refine their keyword search phrase or their chosen search engine.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>5.</strong> 77% of search users choose organic over paid listing when searching, 67% choose organic search when purchasing.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>6.</strong> When the searcher is purchasing, organic click-through generates 25% higher conversion rates than equivalent <a title="What is PPC?" href="http://blueroo-interactive.com/services/internet-marketing/pay-per-click-advertising/">Pay-Per-Click</a> (PPC) click-through.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>7. </strong>80% of unsuccessful searches are followed with keyword refinement. Meaning if unsuccessful the searcher inputs an altered query.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>8.</strong> 62% of search users click a link on the first page of search results</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>9.</strong> 42% of search users click the top-ranking link. 8% click the second-ranking link, and the click-through rate (CTR) continues to drop after.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p>So there you have it, stats proving the value and importance of SEO. Use these yourself to show the facts. Share and pass on this articles and check back soon for more fabulous SEO tips.</p>
         ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/seo-tips-9-statistics-that-prove-seo-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duplicate Content: Is Your Site Being Penalized?</title>
		<link>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/duplicate-content-2009-09/</link>
		<comments>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/duplicate-content-2009-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BlueRoo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google page rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueroo-interactive.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you aware of In a duplicate content penalization by Google?  In a perfect world there would be only one version of every document but in real life this is not true. A great example is online versions of newspaper sites. In one form or another they all publish exactly or close to the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you aware of In a <strong>duplicate content</strong> penalization by Google?  In a perfect world there would be only one version of every document but in real life this is not true. A great example is online versions of newspaper sites. In one form or another they all publish exactly or close to the same information about events and facts.</p>
<p>This also applies to many other areas, say, recipes, fitness programs, diet programs, definitions, explanations and many others.</p>
<p><span id="more-462"></span></p>
<p>Search engines can penalize a sites ranking if it looks as though content has been taken from another site. However, these sites do sit in index and even rank very well. How can this be? Does it mean there are no filters?</p>
<h4>Filters exist, but they are in a primitive form</h4>
<p>Search Engine’s need lots of resources to check the entire internet. Therefore, engines use simple forms to uncover duplicate content.</p>
<h4>How?</h4>
<p>The most common pattern is links. In general engines check between two linked sites for duplicate pages/content. If they exist, then engines try to get rid of the duplicate &#8211; usually the one who links to the source site.</p>
<h4>How does this work?</h4>
<p>If website B (healthy news) republished an article from site A (health research institute) and puts a link from B to A for reference, search engines understands that site A is the original source and the site B has copied it. Site B is seen as dupe content website.</p>
<h4>How do search engines penalize?</h4>
<p>One or two articles like this won’t harm your site much for example, if website B has lots of original content. However, if duplicate content fills a significant number of pages, websites can be penalized by being moved down in the search result pages, moved to supplemental index or even unlisted from search index.</p>
<h4>Test Conducted</h4>
<p>Website X has 5 pages of original content and ranked #1 for very uncommon search term. This website has 100+ links pointing to it and Google PageRank of PR4. After few weeks 30 pages of content from another site that required a link back to it were added. In results, after Google indexed the website, it went from #1 position down to about #67 &#8211; #100. The test was continued by adding even more links – but even an extra 100 links<br />
(now site has over 200 links) didn’t help to move it back of even above these #67 &#8211; #100 low positions.</p>
<p>After 3 months – duplicate pages were removed.  After search engines updated the website &#8211; it slowly moved back to position #2.</p>
<h4>What does it mean to you?</h4>
<p>The idea is simple &#8211; don’t link to websites that have the same content as yours – especially if it is in huge amounts compared to total number of pages.</p>
<h4>What you should do?</h4>
<p>You may not link to websites with duplicate content but your website may have lots of popular articles like from MoreNiche Content Connection, it is useful to follow few rules of thumb which are based on the fact that engines evaluates the whole page’s code not just the article itself.</p>
<p>To put it simply  – engines see all page as code, that probably includes site specific menu, HTML tags, layouts, title, descriptions etc. so it mix it up and articles aren’t considered  as duplicate since it is part of some bigger code. That’s the secret.</p>
<h4>Some useful tips for Content Connection users</h4>
<p>To ensure even more security from search engines it is recommended to use one or more of these tips:</p>
<p>1) Use articles on pages that have a solid size menu<br />
2) Try to have a unique intro and closing for used articles, change titles<br />
3) Use synonyms to replace words<br />
4) Insert comments in the middle of an article or links to detailed info<br />
5) Insert contextual short product reviews (1 picture plus one paragraph and link to full review will be just fine)<br />
6) Split longer articles into 2 pages or more as long there stays 150 – 200 words on each page<br />
7) Rewrite articles into your own words<br />
 <img src='http://blueroo-interactive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Combine two or more articles into one<br />
9) If there are bullet points – mix their order if possible<br />
10)Think outside the box…</p>
<h4>Last tip</h4>
<p>Don’t try to host a DMOZ directory or part of it for making more pages on your website. Google can easily ban you for that and remove your entire site as happened to a website about coffee that hosted 10000 pages from DMOZ to drive extra 500 visitors a day.  Sad but a fact. Duplicate content is evil. Be aware.</p>
         ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blueroo-interactive.com/blog/duplicate-content-2009-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

